MetcalfInstitute
MetcalfInstitute
  • 320
  • 92 518
Restoring the Great Salt Lake: Panel of experts moderated by Ben Winslow
The Great Salt Lake plunged to a historic low in 2022 due to water diversions, drought and a changing climate. The impacts will be significant to the vast majority of Utah’s population around the lake with toxic dust storms, reduced snowpack and harms to public health, wildlife and the economy. What will it take to reverse the lake’s declines within ten years? Join us for an illuminating panel discussion with experts of different perspectives on these vital, multi-layered issues.
Переглядів: 32

Відео

Implications of Under-researching the South Atlantic: Dr. Regina Rodrigues
Переглядів 5721 день тому
Curious about the intricate connections between climate patterns, water scarcity, and the under-explored South Atlantic? In this thought-provoking lecture, Dr. Regina Rodrigues will delve into the fascinating nexus of climate dynamics and water availability in South America. She’ll discuss how the temperatures of the tropical South Atlantic influence climate patterns in northern South America, ...
Environmental Racism and Climate Impacts: Justin Cook & Marquetta Dickens
Переглядів 63Місяць тому
Discover how frontline communities are overcoming environmental challenges in the face of climate change. Join us for an inspiring talk featuring Marquetta Dickens, co-founder of Freedom Org in historic Princeville North Carolina, the first town in America chartered by formerly enslaved Africans after the Civil War. Learn firsthand about the experiences and efforts of Princeville locals as she ...
The Language of Science: Interpreting Graphs and Data
Переглядів 68Місяць тому
Metcalf Institute at University of Rhode Island Science Immersion Workshop Katherine Thompson
Introducing Fara Warner, Metcalf's New Executive Director!
Переглядів 253 місяці тому
Learn more about Fara Warner, Metcalf's new Executive Director; what inspires her and where her vision leads.
Rediscovering The Story in Ourselves, with John Bear Mitchell
Переглядів 1908 місяців тому
Inclusive SciComm Symposium 2023 Keynote The first storyteller tells us that we all have a story within ourselves. It’s easy to forget because our lives get busy with routine. It’s important to remember to keep our story strong and we can do this by simply listening. Together we will learn to understand the importance of our inner story and how to keep that light glowing within our hearts. John...
Transcending Boundaries: Lessons in Inclusive Science Communication from the Global South
Переглядів 2648 місяців тому
Inclusve SciComm Symposium 2023 Keynote Address Dr. Elizabeth Rasekoala President, African Gong (The Pan-African Network for the Popularisation of Science & Technology, and Science Communication) In the past decade, the field of science communication has recognized the urgent need for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in its practices, audiences, and among its professionals. However, these...
Insights from the Climate Beat with Sammy Roth
Переглядів 28011 місяців тому
There’s arguably no subject more important for journalists to get right than climate change. Sammy Roth has spent the last decade learning how to cover this complicated and ever-changing beat, with a focus on the shift from fossil fuels to clean power. He’ll discuss what he’s learned on the front lines of the renewable energy transition, from the difficulty of finding low-conflict sites for sol...
Exploring Inequities in the Transportation Sector with Dr. Sergio Castellanos Rodriguez
Переглядів 79Рік тому
Emphasizing equity in the way sustainable technologies are rolled out and in how decision-makers develop their urban infrastructure planning is critical to ensure a movement towards a just and inclusive society, especially in the context of a clean energy transition. In this talk, Dr. Castellanos Rodriguez focused on a set of local and international examples where, through partnerships with gov...
Revamping America’s Energy Landscape: Balancing Sustainability and Land Use Impact with Dr. Grace Wu
Переглядів 114Рік тому
The latest energy roadmaps for “decarbonizing” (reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions) predict a three to fourfold increase in wind and solar power infrastructure. This scale of growth also needs to consider the impacts on plants, animals, and humans. While most plans for decarbonizing typically focus on technology and economics, Dr. Grace Wu’s research integrates environmental and social ...
Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience and Justice
Переглядів 1982 роки тому
Neighborhoods of color, particularly low-wealth communities, often face worse problems after storms than white and wealthier neighborhoods, especially as more frequent and intense stormwater runoff creates greater hazard exposures. In this lecture, Dr. Marccus Hendricks describes infrastructure challenges and present solutions that integrate justice and participation into the redevelopment of c...
Mind the Gaps :Accounting for Present and Future Flood Risk
Переглядів 1452 роки тому
More than half of flood risk in the U.S. is unmapped, but new technologies are making it possible for researchers to update flood maps. In this video, Dr. Oliver Wing describes future projections that show rising costs, disproportionate economic burdens within Black communities, and the urgent need for adaptation policies at local and national levels. This video was part of the University of Rh...
Slaves for Peanuts: A Conversation with Jori Lewis
Переглядів 2302 роки тому
Slaves for Peanuts: A Conversation with Jori Lewis
How Do We Make Ocean Exploration More Accessible?
Переглядів 1972 роки тому
How Do We Make Ocean Exploration More Accessible?
Towards an Inclusive History of Science Communication
Переглядів 2302 роки тому
Towards an Inclusive History of Science Communication
Joy & Healing as an Othered Person
Переглядів 342 роки тому
Joy & Healing as an Othered Person
Conservation and Environmental Justice: Faith Community Perspectives
Переглядів 1032 роки тому
Conservation and Environmental Justice: Faith Community Perspectives
Access as a move toward inclusion, equity, and diversity in science communication
Переглядів 2462 роки тому
Access as a move toward inclusion, equity, and diversity in science communication
Designing Awards to Reward Inclusive SciComm
Переглядів 142 роки тому
Designing Awards to Reward Inclusive SciComm
Centering Justice, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Science Policy
Переглядів 362 роки тому
Centering Justice, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Science Policy
Scientists as Civic Participants
Переглядів 272 роки тому
Scientists as Civic Participants
Advancing the decolonization agenda in Science Communication & Museums
Переглядів 582 роки тому
Advancing the decolonization agenda in Science Communication & Museums
Inclusive Design of Learning Experiences
Переглядів 192 роки тому
Inclusive Design of Learning Experiences
Expanding Energy Efficiency in Spanish-Speaking Communities through Inclusive Science Communication
Переглядів 262 роки тому
Expanding Energy Efficiency in Spanish-Speaking Communities through Inclusive Science Communication
Disability Accessibility in Science Communication - Barriers and Opportunities
Переглядів 1152 роки тому
Disability Accessibility in Science Communication - Barriers and Opportunities
Co-creating a framework to embed the key traits of Inclusive SciComm in science communication
Переглядів 682 роки тому
Co-creating a framework to embed the key traits of Inclusive SciComm in science communication
Identifying institutional, community strategies and barriers to advancing inclusive STEM culture
Переглядів 242 роки тому
Identifying institutional, community strategies and barriers to advancing inclusive STEM culture
Conversation as Caring
Переглядів 212 роки тому
Conversation as Caring
5 grad students walk into a bar
Переглядів 192 роки тому
5 grad students walk into a bar
The Landscapes of Inclusive SciComm, Media Production & Communication & Engagement with Science
Переглядів 342 роки тому
The Landscapes of Inclusive SciComm, Media Production & Communication & Engagement with Science

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Factjaja-lp4su
    @Factjaja-lp4su 28 днів тому

    Thank you for this! Watching from Uganda-Kampala

  • @tylerdurden4916
    @tylerdurden4916 Місяць тому

    I love this shitt the group three lies into the same video. Racial equity, there is no other race in America that is more racist than the black American or as I like to refer to as the colorless people of America. The colorless people in this country are angry, sensitive , and feel as they are privileged above all of the races. I get why they are angry, because the News tells them how bad off they have it, and just like 99.9% of all Americans we do and feel exactly the way the News tells us to. But let's talk about racial privilege. Let's talk about today's privilege. What kind of person thinks that because they were born a specific race it gives them a privilege above all others? Yes of course this is racism. You have the privilege of all others to use even a word nigga and no other race can use the word... This means you are a racist. Inappropriate and rude to use because people are so sensitive about it, and it hurts their feelings and causes them to get angry. Nothing about when whites were privileged above the colorless people to use water fountains, bathrooms, and other facilities that were in better working conditions than the colorless people. Of course that was racism. Colorless people are more susceptible to brainwashing from the news play actually believe in climate change, and the cover 19.

  • @mlhill2353
    @mlhill2353 2 місяці тому

    If you want to face climate change then go to China, Africa, India, and the countries who actually have the largest carbon footprint and pollute the most. Why destroy the American economy when they are already making improvements and suffering because of new laws that make it impossible to be successful unless they depend on government. All while the major polluters continue to get stronger and stronger. What happens when world powers shift and the world is controlled by countries who do not care about your cause and America and Europe are to weak and irrelevant to do anything about it because your current agenda destroyed them.

  • @martedelapena1350
    @martedelapena1350 2 місяці тому

    Very well explained! Thanks!

  • @JessieNewburn-cs6lj
    @JessieNewburn-cs6lj 3 місяці тому

    Pictures don't do it justice! Totally!

  • @operarioribeiro
    @operarioribeiro 5 місяців тому

    It's also good to support the open science community, such as the NASA Open Source Science Initiative (OSSI).

  • @poudonthiumai4041
    @poudonthiumai4041 6 місяців тому

    ❤ thank you so much Sir 😊

  • @anthonymorris5084
    @anthonymorris5084 8 місяців тому

    According to NASA sea levels are rising at 3.4mm per year. This is imperceptible without scientific instruments. Quick, walk, walk for your lives.

  • @controversiallygreg311
    @controversiallygreg311 9 місяців тому

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~ Do note there is Zero Scientific Evidence of any Global Manmade Climate Crisis ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~ Posted by: Greg Lance - Watkins ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~ Hi, Climate change United Nations: “Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns, mainly caused by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels.”This is the standard caveat published by The UN on websites like UA-cam, Wikipedia, Facebook, and others - it is at best bias, propaganda, exaggeration, or based on deliberate social engineering, it is thus, indisputably, a lie.Sadly it is based on carefully selected data and computer models designed to produce the desired result for those commissioning the prediction. In reality, the statement would seem, from the available facts, to be a lie. Do note there is Zero Scientific Evidence of any Global Manmade Climate Crisis May I suggest YOU read the full IPCC Report, which fails to support the UN’s claims! SUN, The 06B Furthermore, as this entire fraud is for the benefit of a small collective of vested interests, their lackeys in Politics and a small selection of well-funded researchers, and very small percentage of genuine, honest individuals declaring themselves to be ‘Climate Scientists’ consider: For centuries the ‘consensus of scientists claimed the Earth was flat & the ‘consensus of scientists’ & the whole of the Catholic Church agreed the Sun, planets & stars all revolved around our planet! May I remind YOU that there is absolutely no doubt that our climate, on this planet, is driven by our local Star The Sun with strong influence from Plate Tectonics, volcanic action, and some interference from occasional asteroids! Variable outputs that have ensured mankind has great difficulty accurately predicting the weather in the weeks ahead and has shown we haven’t a clue how to accurately predict the planet’s variable climate despite having some belief that it is in some way cyclical, in manners we can only guess at. Real science has always been evolving, with ever more accurate knowledge, it has never been reliable and has always depended on debate, new information & proof! Only a fool would make the claim that there was a situation of ‘settled science’. Remember around 80% of the electricity we use is generated by Oil, Gas & other, so-called, Fossil Fuels & there is no scientific proof that CO2 causes Climate Change OR Global Warming, merely the current theory using current selected models! Our planet has had a changing climate, with periods of warming, cooling & ice ages for 4.6 BILLION years. Even periods of tropical temperatures and others when it is believed the evidence shows heavy rainfall for 24 hours a day for up to 10,000 years. Just as it would seem that molten lava spilled out of a rupture right across where Siberia is today for 1,000s of years. Very late in the day: Primates emerged around 165,000,000 years ago, then Mankind started to emerge about 150,000 years ago, Denisovans & Neandertals about 80,000 years ago and then Homosapiens. We survived the last ice age and started itinerant farming around 20,000 years ago and the end of the ice age around 13,000 brought about extensive settled farming and towns and cities burgeoned. In around 1810 mankind finally numbered 1 Billion, and now we have reached 8 Billion. We are fortunate in never have we been so healthy, well fed, well housed, and had so much choice. Our life expectancy in Britain in 1909 was around 42 it is now over 80 as a result of food production (dependent on CO2 & heavily supported by Oil based fertilisers!), development dependent on oil & gas (warm homes, heating and reliable electricity and cooking), initiative, invention, and medicine all of which was gifted to the world having been, in the main created by the Western Civilisations. It is also worth noting that for millenia now and currently, sea levels have been relatively stable and in the last 100 years very few people have died due to the climate. Most of those deaths have been due to cold - storms and hurricanes, typhoons and volcanic action have also been relatively mild, with the only outstanding examples being a ~9.2 magnitude Cascadia earthquake on January 26, 1700 that caused a tsunami that struck the west coast of North America and Japan the eruption of Tambora in 1815, Krakatoa in 1883. The 900 mile fault shift of the subductive Indo/Australian fault rated at 9.1 in 2004 was also of great note. Obviously, there has been other volcanic actions, but of lesser note, we live on a Volcanic planet here is the map of 28 eruptions for the week upto 01-Aug-2023: VOLCANIC ACTIVITY 28 - Week ending 01-Aug-2023 Let us not forget the green effects of the provision of Oil, gas, coal, nuclear & electric fuel for cooking and heating this means, cutting down trees for fuel is not required, as oil & gas, etc. are incredibly abundant, and cheap to access & provide. In a pretence of being green billions of acres of forest & agricultural land are abused, growing trees for fuel and biomass, which requires Millions of gallons/barrels of oil for production, ploughing, harrowing, seeding, spraying etc. not to mention the millions of heavy tractor hours working & miles of road usage transporting the crop to biomass! In terms of Green & Net Zero - Consider the Billions of tons of coal used to make the steel, cement and glass for Wind Turbines & Solar Panels, both of which are hugely environmentally damaging, ineffdicient to the point of being almost completely useless and with a very short life before THEy are the RENEWABLE bit of energy andf a large mountain of toxic wast, all of which uses a huge amount of Oil for transportation to site and for disposal. IF you have fallen for the fraud of Climate Crisis and CO2, are you aware that there is absolutely no chance a Wind Turbine or Solar Panel will save on CO2 output or Coal, oil & gas usage! Currently, over 80% of the energy used by mankind is generated by so-called fossil fuels and in the UK at least 73% is generated by the same means! This year, worldwide 15 Billion tons of fossil fuels will be burned and 97 Million barrels per day or 37 Billion Barrels a year of Oil will be used. Do be aware that ANY reduction in this use will result in damage to mankind - and do not overlook the Billions of tons of fuel required to make environmentally damaging Wind Turbines, Solar Panels & EVs, and the Oil used to transport them and install them, not to mention the toxic waste these damaging products leave after 10 to 15 years! How can we dispose of the failed cars, dead batteries, huge amount of plastics used and ever greater usage of tyre wear and tyre failure? Without a collapse in the survival of mankind there is no realistic possibility of noticeably reducing mankind’s use of Coal, Oil and Gas & we are obscenely damaging the environment with growing biomass crops and forests for biomass and transporting them Millions of miles. There will be net zero effect on the planet’s climate whatever man does - there will also be no change in fuel use for at least 50 years and Net Zero is a total fraud that risks annihilating life on Earth! As for Electric cars - the level of pollution exceeds the pollution output of modern internal combustion vehicles and the toxic waste level of electric vehicles far outstrips that of combustion engined vehicles! Also, production of the incredibly heavy batteries is totally dependent on child labour and near-slavery standards & conditions in their production! Also do be aware that the road damage and tyre pollution by EVs far outstrips Internal Combustion cars - not forgetting the irrefutable fact that due to the electricity use increase for cars alone we will have to increase the number of Pylons by 1/3rd and dig up almost all streets in Britain to install substations and power boxes by at least 1/3rd. that is for cars alone. Now take into consideration the undeniable fact that there is Net Zero chance of putting in the required charging points within 50 years and at the rate of replacement of cars with EVs there is Net Zero chance of ceasing the use of internal combustion engines in cars by 2050 - in fact at the present rate it will take 300 years to replace Britain’s cars with EVs. Regards, Greg_L-W. ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

  • @stevehewitt1151
    @stevehewitt1151 10 місяців тому

    Utter bollocks!

  • @felipearbustopotd
    @felipearbustopotd 10 місяців тому

    Maybe floating structures could be a 'simple' solution? Thank you for uploading and sharing.

  • @JUSTADDLIGHT360
    @JUSTADDLIGHT360 10 місяців тому

    Stop building towns in the ocean. Boom

  • @javiersantos4385
    @javiersantos4385 Рік тому

    Great video Dillon, don't get discouraged by the low views, you are good at this!

  • @donaldboomer6313
    @donaldboomer6313 2 роки тому

    Renewables can't replace oil as an energy source. They can't even come close to match the energy needed by any nation unless some new system or invention makes replacement realistic. Maybe nuclear can but any accident would be a long tern disaster. Raising gas pricing will ruin transportation, and commerce resulting in closing businesses, explode unemployment and ultimately lead to widespread starvation and death. Forcing rapid change when there is no know alternative would be a disaster for populations.

  • @sqd37l
    @sqd37l 2 роки тому

    this is one big load of bullshit

  • @cgee3057
    @cgee3057 2 роки тому

    I really enjoyed watching this video, please make more! Wow, you need to research P-R-O-M-O-S-M.

  • @darllafranchillo1281
    @darllafranchillo1281 2 роки тому

    Seth is the definition of STUPID! Did humans cause the dust bowl of the 1930's when little to no fossil fuel was be used? You climate activists are just fully nonsense and non-science.

  • @rohitnegi4959
    @rohitnegi4959 2 роки тому

    like that colonialism is discussed here in specifics rather than the direction that the postcolonial turn has taken in South Asia, which is, predominantly semiotic.

  • @elenafranklin4448
    @elenafranklin4448 2 роки тому

    Love the strength, her uniqueness, her resilience! THANK YOU for your hard work in the STEM field!! Making your mark, using your mind and applying your talents and leaving the next generation with more hope and inspiration to reach their FULLEST potential 💙

  • @lisalevin8776
    @lisalevin8776 2 роки тому

    This is an important and eye opening presentation that should be shared widely among scientists. So many things to think about!

  • @Interglacial_optimist
    @Interglacial_optimist 3 роки тому

    The speaker used large strange words in sentences that turned my head in two scrambled eggs

  • @JamesSmith-by3qy
    @JamesSmith-by3qy 3 роки тому

    Now that the US government is saying that UFOs are real, now can we use the free energy perpetual motion overunity zero point energy generators!? The schoolgirl built the John Bedini free energy motor over 12 years ago now. And there are many others, like the Perendev motor, Newman motor, Stanley Meyer water powered car, etc.! and the one with the wheel of v gates and the cam lifter. And the George Green magnet free energy motor. Or one of many thousands or millions of others. They've existed since 800 BC or earlier, especially from the 1400s on. They've been being patented in the USA since 1799, when a "permanent magnet mill" was patented! Of course some are fake so they have to test.

  • @michaelb2211
    @michaelb2211 3 роки тому

    Chuck Norris has finally been defeated

  • @JohnPowell6
    @JohnPowell6 3 роки тому

    Carl Sagan, Bill Nye, and Neil deGrasse Tyson succeeded as science communicators by being themselves, and so will you. You rock!

  • @sydmos7009
    @sydmos7009 4 роки тому

    very interesting !

  • @robertgreen2448
    @robertgreen2448 4 роки тому

    0:27 crazygirls24.com

  • @hanlei7535
    @hanlei7535 4 роки тому

    Thanks for sharing. Great combination of IoT and water systems! Hope to do something as interesting as his work

  • @rapauli
    @rapauli 4 роки тому

    This is important history. Thank you very much for posting. You are doing more than ABC - which has broken links to Blakemore content. Long live the archives!

  • @EnviroAnnotations
    @EnviroAnnotations 4 роки тому

    ua-cam.com/channels/K-tlYPpan3N1WsgNSy5apA.html We are the first environmental weekly in India. We are looking forward to learning, networking in the field of environmental journalism - including climate change, pollution, water, energy and so on.

  • @stevens8495
    @stevens8495 5 років тому

    This talk should be required viewing for all policy makers and presidential candidates. Great view of the power landscape and renewables

  • @whaleoilbeefhooked3892
    @whaleoilbeefhooked3892 5 років тому

    Great talk! Everyone is a scientist. Science lingo is just "jazz". Simple questions by simple people are hard to ask these science types. When science is a one way street because of the lingo deficiency our world becomes nothing more than trust. Trust is anything but science. For starters, when people ask questions of our most basic foundations of where we live, we get bombarded by theory and confused genius-like lingo. A simple question might be, where do we go to physically observe Earth's curve? The answer from scientists is always "images from space". Since images are not true photos, where can the simple person go and view Earth's curve with our own eyes? When science comes up empty, one asks; why isn't the simple Earth curve formula taught in grade school (8inches of vertical drop X the miles of distance squared) so the simple person can go and find the curve of where they live all on their own. So simple. They need to see the curve to know they belong on Earth. Make science 'THAT' simple! For instance, when a pilot is asked (if they've seen Earth's curve), they may refer to their artificial horizon indicator CGI layered over their physical view that shows the pilot's circular viewing boundary as a comparison and they themselves become convinced the difference presented to them is the Earth's curve! Yikes! They don't know the formula. Science belongs to everyone. Teach the Earth curve formula in grade school. Why hide it? Let people find out where they actually live. Everyone can then be a scientist. Let the scientists have their own thoughts and learn where they live so they are not locked into the controlled mathematical mind of matter and trust. Free humanity, and become a scientist.

  • @whaleoilbeefhooked3892
    @whaleoilbeefhooked3892 5 років тому

    Great talk! Science does need to change! The jargon is only understood by the elite. Simple questions by simple people cannot be answered and it becomes a trust environment which is anything but science. For starters, when people ask; where do they teach people to go where they can physically observe Earth's curve? The answer from science is images from space. Images are not photos so where can the simple person go and view this with our own eyes? Why isn't the simple Earth curve formula taught in grade school (8inches of vertical drop X the miles away squared) so the simple person can find the curve of where they live - they need to see it. When a pilots artificial horizon is layered over the physical view we see the pilots circular viewing boundary and some are convinced it's the Earth's curve! yikes.

  • @billyjoesmo8251
    @billyjoesmo8251 6 років тому

    I am from your future in 2018 April 7th The methane bomb has begun.Welcome to future Atlantis 2 .

  • @frankenz66
    @frankenz66 6 років тому

    Atmospheric jet stream has been getting "wavier" for thousands of years actually. Not a new concept. Not extra CO2 pumped by man. In fact, Indonesia's Mt Sinabung just this week pumped more CO2 into the atmosphere than man has since 1850.

    • @billhart9832
      @billhart9832 6 років тому

      Franklin Taylor you are completely in error which is why your cite nothing but your uninformed opinion. In fact, Humans emit annually 100 times more than all volcanos combined annually. www.scientificamerican.com/article/earthtalks-volcanoes-or-humans/

    • @frankenz66
      @frankenz66 6 років тому

      Well thank you for your uninformed link dropping ...opinion. You offer nothing as well I see but a bought out and paid for article from a well known bought out magazine. We're not talking PAST volcanoes were talking current ones and many are erupting everywhere. More than they have in years. You all like to say any one opposing the view of man made global warming is supported or supporting big oil I will accuse your side of being bought out by leftist rabble rousers. No links needed.

    • @frankenz66
      @frankenz66 6 років тому

      Thanks for the hilarious factless filled link.. You morons don't want to face up to the fact that Antarctica will never melt unless the equator were to turn full on that continent. That would never be man's fault. Undersea volcanoes are working in those areas that they are marginally melting. A continent that has a mean temperature of -68 degrees F will never melt at that rate.No link needed to prove ice doesn't melt at -68 fool. Thanks.

  • @patersjy
    @patersjy 6 років тому

    Very illuminating 😊

  • @eddonks4293
    @eddonks4293 6 років тому

    Disappearing huh? ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

    • @Nhoj737
      @Nhoj737 6 років тому

      “For climate change, there are many scientific organizations that study the climate. These alphabet soup of organizations include NASA, NOAA, JMA, WMO, NSIDC, IPCC, UK Met Office, and others. Click on the names for links to their climate-related sites. There are also climate research organizations associated with universities. These are all legitimate scientific sources. If you have to dismiss all of these scientific organizations to reach your opinion, then you are by definition denying the science. If you have to believe that all of these organizations, and all of the climate scientists around the world, and all of the hundred thousand published research papers, and physics, are all somehow part of a global, multigenerational conspiracy to defraud the people, then you are, again, a denier by definition. So if you deny all the above scientific organizations there are a lot of un-scientific web sites out there that pretend to be science. Many of these are run by lobbyists (e.g.., Climate Depot, run by a libertarian political lobbyist, CFACT), or supported by lobbyists (e.g., JoannaNova, WUWT, both of whom have received funding and otherwise substantial support by lobbying organizations like the Heartland Institute), or are actually paid by lobbyists to write Op-Eds and other blog posts that intentionally misrepresent the science.” thedakepage.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/how-to-assess-climate-change.html

    • @eddonks4293
      @eddonks4293 6 років тому

      Nhoj737 NASA, NOAA, IPCC and the likes have been proven to be far from credible in their data representations. See below for a good example of this.... realclimatescience.com/biggest-fraud-in-science-history/

    • @Nhoj737
      @Nhoj737 6 років тому

      "Models successfully reproduce temperatures since 1900 globally, by land, in the air and the ocean." www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 6 років тому

      +Ed Donks So you provided link to DMI analysis showing Arctic sea ice volume 2015-2017 is down 28% since average 2004-2013. Was that your point ? Was your point that Arctic sea ice volume will be zero in 7.5/28% = 27 years ? That's too simplistic of you. It might be many years longer. You are an allarmalibbitard.

    • @eddonks4293
      @eddonks4293 6 років тому

      grindupBaker on the contrary. My point was to indicate that arctic sea ice volumes have not declined as significantly as this video states. As you can see so far 2018 is up on the last two years which refutes the current claims of decline. Yes there has been decline due to natural warming which has now swung into a cooling phase and we are now seeing ice gains in the area.

  • @patersjy
    @patersjy 6 років тому

    Thank you very much. Comprehensive and clear.

  • @mariajohnson2632
    @mariajohnson2632 6 років тому

    Easy too understand...good teacher

  • @solveigsokcanic5724
    @solveigsokcanic5724 6 років тому

    GEOENGINEERING USING TOXIC AEROSOLS ARE CONTROLLING THE WEATHER !!!! TELL THE TRUTH .. LOOK UP :: EXTENSIVE LIST OF PATENTS GEOENGINEERING WATCH

  • @OutSideTheBoxFormat
    @OutSideTheBoxFormat 6 років тому

    2016 was also a ENSO year.

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 6 років тому

      You are entirely correct. This was Published May 30, 2017 so I'm not calling cherry-picking deceit but it does skate quite close. I vaguely recall the settled-back 2017 temperatures as about half way between 2014 and 2016, sort of like +0.85 2014 up to +1.27 2016 and back to 1.05 2017 but anybody interested can find the information in 5 minutes.

  • @vulcanfeline
    @vulcanfeline 6 років тому

    number of Likes was 42 so i hesitated adding another but i did ;)

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 6 років тому

      What's the Meaning of your statement.

  • @francisoboyle6136
    @francisoboyle6136 6 років тому

    Awesome work! I live in New Jersey and it's clear that this is what's causing the current weather pattern. We had better get solid Leadership soon for it's starting to look like there will be no holing back the effects of abrupt change.

  • @accorddeparis4379
    @accorddeparis4379 6 років тому

    As accorddeparis.org explains Mayors could transition to zero emission cities in under a year but aren't, and so as also explained all life including humans will be extinct in under a decade, perhaps just 2-5 years. We are at a critical fork in the road and failing to act with urgency and prudence.

  • @waynehooper9093
    @waynehooper9093 6 років тому

    Excellent presentation. Thank you.

  • @olly3700
    @olly3700 7 років тому

    nice talk, however, I'd like to see more of the slides or videos. valuable work. move on...

  • @PeterKnagge
    @PeterKnagge 8 років тому

    Very sorry. Buoys pronounced "boys" not "booies". When you say it like that you sound uneducated.

  • @heardofjohn6854
    @heardofjohn6854 8 років тому

    Okay - just got my question answered. That same cute little girl in "Lies My Father Told Me" IS this same intelligent, impressive and accomplished young woman.

  • @jimmartindale
    @jimmartindale 8 років тому

    Just love that pic of the erosion with strip-till, Jerry. Yucko!!!

  • @heardofjohn6854
    @heardofjohn6854 8 років тому

    Is Cleo Paskal the same as the child actress in "Lies My Father Told Me", (one of my favorite films). If so, that would absolutely floor me.